With days to go until 538 electors officially decide on the next US president, the "faithless" are hard at work to ensure that person is not Donald Trump. Activists need to convince 232 Democratic electors plus 38 Republican electors to vote for someone else. That person would presumably be a Republican, not Hillary Clinton, as there are more Republican national electors overall, but activists hope Democrats feel anyone would be better than Trump, reports KDVR. Is such a scenario at all likely?
- It would certainly be a break with tradition. Throughout US history, more than 99% of electors have voted for the candidate who won their state, which is legally required in 29 states, reports the AP. However, "no elector has ever been prosecuted for failing to vote as pledged."
- It wouldn't be unconstitutional as electors are only required to "meet in their respective states and vote by ballot," writes Columbia law professor David Pozen at the New York Times. Indeed, he argues electors have an "obligation to preserve the country and the Constitution" and should stand against what might be perceived as a threat.