SCOTUS Sides With GOP on Challenged SC Voting Map

6-3 opinion found Republican-controlled state legislature did nothing wrong during redistricting
By Newser Editors and Wire Services
Posted May 23, 2024 1:10 PM CDT
SCOTUS Sides With GOP on South Carolina Voting Map
The US Supreme Court is seen, April 25, 2024, in Washington.   (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib, File)

The Supreme Court on Thursday preserved a Republican-held South Carolina congressional district, rejecting a lower-court ruling that said the district discriminated against Black voters. The court's conservative majority said in a 6-3 decision that the Republican-controlled state legislature did nothing wrong during redistricting when it strengthened Rep. Nancy Mace's hold on the coastal district by moving 30,000 Democratic-leaning Black residents of Charleston out of the district, reports the AP. In dissent, the liberal justices said the ruling would "impede racial gerrymandering cases generally."

The state argued that partisan politics, not race, and a population boom in coastal areas explain the congressional map. Moving voters based on their politics is OK, the Supreme Court has held. A lower court had ordered South Carolina to redraw the district after it found that the state used race as a proxy for partisan affiliation in violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. But that court had put its order on hold and had already allowed the state to use the challenged map in the 2024 elections.

Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the court, criticized lower-court judges for their "misguided approach" that refused to presume that lawmakers acted in good faith and gave too much credit to the challengers. Alito wrote that one weakness of the Black voters' case was that they did not produce an alternative map, which he called an "implicit concession" that they couldn't have drawn one. "The District Court's conclusions are clearly erroneous because it did not follow this basic logic," he wrote.

story continues below

Justice Elena Kagan, writing for the three liberals, said her conservative colleagues ignored the work of the lower court that found the district had been gerrymandered by race. "Perhaps most dispiriting," Kagan wrote, the court adopted "special rules to specially disadvantage suits to remedy race-based redistricting." When Mace first won election in 2020, she edged Democratic incumbent Rep. Joe Cunningham by 1%, under 5,400 votes. In 2022, following redistricting driven by the 2020 census results, Mace won reelection by 14%.

(More SCOTUS stories.)

Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.