Supreme Court Needs Term Limits: Legal Eagles

Urge end to lifelong terms, judges' case selection
By Matt Cantor,  Newser Staff
Posted Feb 23, 2009 8:26 AM CST
Supreme Court Needs Term Limits: Legal Eagles
In this 2007 file photo, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts pauses during a speech in Washington.   (AP Photo)

The US judicial system is in need of a serious overhaul, law experts write in a letter to congressional leaders. They argue that Supreme Court justices shouldn’t keep their posts for life, instead taking 18-year terms before a shift in status, the Washington Post reports. Further, they say, the justices shouldn’t be allowed to decide which cases they’ll take on.

That policy fuels an image of a court “not just powerful but arrogant.” Instead, there should be a separate division of justices who review cases and send 80-100 to the high court annually. Last year, the court gave 67 opinions, the lowest number in decades. Meanwhile, justices with health troubles that pose on-the-job difficulties should be asked to resign, the experts urge. (More US Supreme Court stories.)

Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.