Entertainment | Daybreakers review Daybreakers Dim, But It's No Twilight It either breaks the vamp-flick mold, or is another sorry entry By Harry Kimball Posted Jan 8, 2010 12:05 PM CST Copied Daybreakers Dim, But It's No Twilight A trailer for "Daybreakers." (YouTube) Critics agree that Daybreakers is visually inventive, but the B-movie charms of this vampire/oil allegory don't snare everyone. Some opinions: Willem Dafoe "and his Southern drawl goose things up," Joe Neumaier writes for the New York Daily News, and Ethan Hawke "has a greasy romanticism." But directors the Spierig brothers "seem to lose interest in what they've created, a feeling that's infectious." The film "bursts with clever ideas and resonant concepts," Keith Phipps writes at the Onion AV Club. But the "plot digs into a rut," and the "cleverly constructed, uncomfortably familiar world makes a deeper impression than much of what happens within it." "After all the toothless, limp-dick vampire posturing in the Twilight chick flicks, it's a kick to see a balls-out, R-rated movie about bloodsuckers that doesn't spare the gore so little girls won't cry into their Twitpics of Rob Pattinson," Peter Travers writes in Rolling Stone. Yeah, it's a B movie. "I'll take that over pompous any day." The "thin metaphor for our situation with oil" has "promising elements of a socio-satirical horror movie," Owen Gleiberman writes in Entertainment Weekly. But it devolves into a "ponderous apocalyptic chase film," like "Children of Men with exploding-plasma shock effects." Read These Next Trump has threatened to revoke Rosie O'Donnell's citizenship. FEMA failed to answer thousands of calls after the Texas floods. Newsom turns nickname back on Trump. Air India pilots cut off fuel to engines 30 seconds into flight. See 1 photo Report an error