Polar Bears Won't Get 'Endangered' Label

Environmentalists angry that they're merely 'threatened'
By John Johnson,  Newser Staff
Posted Dec 23, 2010 4:11 PM CST
Polar Bears Won't Get 'Endangered' Label
Polar bear Flocke eats a birthday cake made in with ice, herring, and fruit in France on Dec. 9.   (AP Photo/Lionel Cironneau)

Not everybody's heaping praise on the Obama administration this week: Environmentalists are fuming that the Fish and Wildlife Service decided not to ramp up protection of polar bears by changing their status from "threatened" to "endangered." In response to a court deadline, the agency said yesterday that the bears are indeed at risk, just not the imminent risk the "endangered" label requires, reports the Washington Post.

"I guess if a wrecking ball is barreling down on your house, you are just 'threatened,'" Andrew Wetzler of the Natural Resources Defense Council told AFP. The heightened status could have created a regulatory mess by requiring the Obama administration to curb greenhouse gas emissions, notes the New York Times. Click here to read about fears that climate change could create a new polar-grizzly beast. (More polar bears stories.)

Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
X
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.

X