Afghan Calculus: 40K Troops Equals $40B

High long-term costs a big factor in debate
By John Johnson,  Newser Staff
Posted Nov 14, 2009 4:04 PM CST
Afghan Calculus: 40K Troops Equals $40B
Marines board a chopper en route to Helmand province.   (AP Photo/Brennan Linsley)

When President Obama rejected advisers' recommendations on Afghan troops and insisted they be retooled with exit strategies, he had the war's long-term financial costs in mind, an insider tells the New York Times. While military strategy gets the headlines, the financial constraints also are weighing heavily. Some specfics:

  • Gen. McChyrstal's preferred option of adding 40,000 troops would cost $40 billion to $54 billion per year.

  • Even going with a lesser number of say 30,000 troops would wipe out the $26 billion to be saved next year when US troops leave Iraq.
  • Figure a rough baseline of $1 million per soldier per year. That's up from an estimate of $390,000 in 2006, largely because of the unique challenges posed by Afghanistan. Mountainous terrain can result in a $400 gallon of fuel.
  • A troop increase could push the overall military budget to as high as $734 billion, a politically dicey prospect for Obama. The Bush team's peak was $667 billion.
(Read more President Obama stories.)

We use cookies. By Clicking "OK" or any content on this site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. Read more in our privacy policy.
Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.