Presidential Candidates Play Too Nice

Negative campaigning is more memorable and brings out voters
By Kate Schwartz,  Newser User
Posted Sep 16, 2007 1:43 PM CDT
Presidential Candidates Play Too Nice
Republican presidential hopeful former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, center, greets fellow candidates, from left, Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., former Secretary of Health and Human Services Tommy Thompson, Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., and former New York city Mayor Rudy Giuliani, right, prior to the...   (Associated Press)

Except for a few barbs here and there, the 2008 campaign has been as polite as a tea party, and that's not a good thing, reports Reuters. Though many assume negative campaigning turns off voters, it's the negative details that stick and actually spur voters to cast a ballot, researchers say. "Democracy itself requires negativity," says one professor. "We want the right to be critical of those in power."

The candidates' decorum is partially out of thrift; the unusually early start to next year's contest has them watching their spending on ads, a traditional venue for attacking fellow candidates and highlighting differing viewpoints. But testy exchanges—Clinton calling Obama a novice on international affairs, Giuliani attacking Clinton for questioning the judgment of Gen. Petraeus—are said to help draw voters in, not turn them away. (More Election 2008 stories.)

Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
X
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.

X