Apocalypse Not Now: Saving the Earth Demands Positive Vision

The answer is funding innovations, say writers
By Jonas Oransky,  Newser Staff
Posted Sep 18, 2007 3:48 AM CDT

Apocalyptic thinking and small solutions aren’t capable of saving the world in the Inconvenient Truth age; instead, we need optimism and innovation funding, say New Republic writers Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger. Reducing energy consumption, at the root of global warming, is not realistic, they argue.

The mammoth challenge we face "is to double global energy production by mid-century while simultaneously cutting greenhouse gas emissions in half," they write. The answer is not to "limit human power" but to "unleash" it by funding research and innovative technologies that will ultimately make clean energy cheaper than dirty energy. (Read more environmentalism stories.)

We use cookies. By Clicking "OK" or any content on this site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. Read more in our privacy policy.
Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.